The respondent did not show up to the hearing. They also did not show up to the gun relinquishment hearing, where it was noted they have approached another VC firm with a firearm before being apprehended by the police.
The san mateo prosecutor's office was notified of non-compliance.
This seems unlikely to have any sort of happy ending.
The claim that he approached another VC firm is incorrect.
He was invited to the location via text message, where the founder encouraged him to apply and be accepted into their accelerator program. Upon arrival, the situation became uncomfortable, with individuals attempting to intimidate and surround him.
There is a growing concern among founders about how ideas are handled in these environments, and situations like this only reinforce those concerns.
It’s important not to misrepresent what actually happened.
It seems like some people are trying to portray him as something he’s not.
He has been focused on building startups since arriving in Silicon Valley and has created multiple products over the years. That track record speaks more clearly than speculative claims.
I’ve been on this earth for a few days. Something tells me there is probably a better word than “founder” that could be used to describe this guy if legal action is being taken against him
Agreed. I will say that poking around a bit more on that site it looks like a temporary restraining order involving the same parties was granted, so perhaps there's some more history to this dispute than just what is visible on said link.
"Workplace violence restraining orders" in California appear to be a type of restraining order that can be filed by an employer on behalf of an employee, to protect said employee from a third party
From what I understand, no firearm was involved in this situation. When the individual arrived, he asked to pitch, and shortly after, staff/security asked him to leave.
The founder shared his story and recorded video at the time. This founder has also built a 3D printer and developed several other projects.
There may be additional context from law enforcement as well, but it’s important to rely on verified information rather than assumptions.
Looks like this guy tried to brandish a firearm while attempting to meet with the plaintiff, a restraining order seems very reasonable given the circumstances.
https://web.sanmateocourt.org/midx/
Search for 26-CIV-00518
Deep link to the petition/complaint PDF: https://tinyurl.com/32xj5djy
(The details are the last page)
The respondent did not show up to the hearing. They also did not show up to the gun relinquishment hearing, where it was noted they have approached another VC firm with a firearm before being apprehended by the police. The san mateo prosecutor's office was notified of non-compliance.
This seems unlikely to have any sort of happy ending.
He was invited to the location via text message, where the founder encouraged him to apply and be accepted into their accelerator program. Upon arrival, the situation became uncomfortable, with individuals attempting to intimidate and surround him.
There is a growing concern among founders about how ideas are handled in these environments, and situations like this only reinforce those concerns.
It’s important not to misrepresent what actually happened.
He has been focused on building startups since arriving in Silicon Valley and has created multiple products over the years. That track record speaks more clearly than speculative claims.
https://selfhelp.courts.ca.gov/WV-restraining-order
The founder shared his story and recorded video at the time. This founder has also built a 3D printer and developed several other projects.
There may be additional context from law enforcement as well, but it’s important to rely on verified information rather than assumptions.
Dulat, is that you?