Since its behind an account wall, I can't tell if they are saying that Opus made the clone for cheaper or that Opus failed?
It appears that Fable did far more "work" based on output tokens.
Aside: We should just ban Twitter links. Nobody should be required to make an account to view content on here.
On the aside, where's the difference between someone posting a Twitter link and an Economist link? Both are locked behind a wall, whether it account-wall or pay-wall.
Yeah, I have to manually edit the URL to be xcancel instead every time. Maybe there's a grease monkey script around that handles this kind of thing. I can write one if not.
Aside: We should just ban Twitter links. Nobody should be required to make an account to view content on here.
what would we be left to read? couple of snarky remarks and maybe 2-3 paragraph of coherent text.
journalism is a job! money has to come from somewhere
Edit: going to try this out https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/531615-x-com-to-xcancel-co...
Does it do anything now that it didn’t before?
Who’s this for?
Why did it matter?
Is the world better now?
Unfortunately the post doesn’t discuss outcomes so I’m having a hard time seeing how the team’s $800 was best spent on this vs. some other priority.
If you can spend $800 on Fable in a day, you can launch a fantastic looking/performing personal site in 15 minutes ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Perhaps Hacker News could ban this style of link to help encourage that?
social media, also started heavily demoting posts with external links.
thus if you want reach, you need to post on platforms...